However, if you’re looking to go a step-up and have some cash to spare, the Ryzen 5 3600X provides a great jump to the mid-range of CPUs. The 3600X may have the twelve threads which could be better for multi-tasking, streaming etc, but the 3300X offered a balance between performance in both light and heavy threaded applications. At stock settings, it could almost keep up with the Ryzen 5 3600X. We ran the 3300X with an RTX2060, and it offered great performance. If you’re looking to build a budget gaming PC, the AMD Ryzen 3 3300X is the way to go. In Handbrake Power and Blender, lower score is better, while the rest are better when the score/number is higher. ![]() When it comes to performance benchmarking, we’ve put the Ryzen 3 3300X through several tests as shown below. The samples AMD sent us didn’t come with any stock coolers, so we had to use our own Cooler Master MasterLiquid ML240R RGB. During day to day use, you won’t see much difference, but when it comes to actual software and game crunching, you’ll notice that there’s a slight difference when it comes to FPS and power consumption. ![]() In comparison, the aMD Ryzen 5 3600X does offer larger numbers in its hardware specs, mainly with more CPU cores, threads, max boost clock, higher cache, higher TDP, and faster PCIe 4.0 x16 interface. Before we head into benchmarking these CPUs, let’s first take a look at the specs:
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |